#Spectre film boycott snowden movie#
#Spectre film boycott snowden free#

#Spectre film boycott snowden free#

With his heavily be-stickered laptop, he transforms in Spectre from outfitter of nifty death machines to white-hat hacker, singlehandedly bringing down a surveillance network that threatens the free world.When Jagmohan Dalmiya sits down with fellow members of the International Cricket Council on May 2-3 to tackle the worst crisis to hit the sport, lurking in the background will be the threat of a divide between the subcontinent and the rest of the tiny cricketing world. Sure, Q starts off by forever damning Bond to life as a radio antenna on a virtual tether, but he turns out to be a geek with an unshakeable moral center. It’s Q, who bears a striking resemblance to Edward Snowden.

#Spectre film boycott snowden movie#

The movie also shows us what kind of hero we need to prevent such a dystopian future - and it isn’t Bond. M is an imperfect messenger, calling as he does for a return to the traditional core value of assassination mano a mano - but he makes a powerful argument, on purely pragmatic terms: “All the surveillance in the world can’t tell you what to do next.” What if mass surveillance by an ostensibly beneficent national government really means that whatever the government collects is de facto transparent to SPECTRE, SMERSH, Kaos, the mob, the cartels, Carlos the Jackal, ISIS, and Vladimir Putin? It’s a nice idea, but so unrealistic that Spectre’s more dystopian vision actually seems more plausible. Way back in 1998, science-fiction author David Brin published a influential non-fiction book called The Transparent Society in which he argues that limiting the collection of information is futile, and that therefore the only solution is to share the powers of surveillance with the citizenry - enabling the public to watch the government as well as the government watches the public. A draft Investigatory Powers Bill unveiled just last week would institutionalize profound invasions of privacy, from snooping on domestic web-browsing histories to bulk hacking. with one surveillance camera for every 11 people. The timing of the movie is extraordinarily propitious, especially in Britain, which is already much more of a surveillance state than the U.S. M inevitably describes the massive surveillance network that C is building as “George Orwell’s worst nightmare.” In response, C literally laughs at M’s devotion to the quaint notion of “democracy.” Subtle it ain’t, but the central point - that ubiquitous surveillance is an inevitably totalitarian tool, not just inappropriate for democratic society, but actively inimical to it - is often underappreciated in the current debate. While Bond is pursuing his super-villain, his boss M wages a losing bureaucratic war with C, who’s more of an NSA/GCHQ type. And if it’s collected, somewhere, be assured the bad guys can get their hands on it. But it’s hugely useful to the bad guys - be they extortionists, terrorists, or power-mad bureaucrats. Knowing everything about everyone is actually of limited use to the good guys. But Spectre emphatically asserts that you can do more harm with total information than you can good. The standard inside-the-Beltway arguments about surveillance assume there’s a tradeoff between national security and privacy. Smart blood equals geospatial emasculation.Īnd there’s another way that Spectre makes a valuable contribution to the typically staid public discourse about the surveillance state. For Bond, his very blood now robs him of his M.O. Most of us have no choice any longer but to carry mobile phones, even though they rob us of our locational privacy. But it’s a pretty good metaphor for those omnipresent tracking devices that, in real life, have become a de facto extension of our bodies: our phones. There is no such thing as “smart blood,” of course. And trusting in the security of government computer systems, as the movie demonstrates, is probably not a good idea. But long term? Even assuming that only MI6 can lock onto his bloody beacon and that MI6 can’t be hacked, his bosses will still always know where he is. Sure, in Spectre, he manages to slip off the grid temporarily - thanks to Q’s plot-friendly indulgence. For Bond, constantly broadcasting his location makes it virtually impossible to sneak around. Presumably it turns his circulatory system into a radio, battery, and powerful antenna all in one, and is irreversible.

“Smart blood,” Q tells us, allows MI6 to track Bond absolutely anywhere he goes in the entire world. But his undoing will not come from the Special Executive for Counterintelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion, or Ernst Stavro Blofeld, or a jilted Bond girl.īond is doomed because early in the movie Spectre, the otherwise benevolent Q, muttering something about nanotechnology and microchips, injects him with “smart blood.”